Jury Duty…
I started the week by reporting for jury duty promptly at 8am on Monday. Well, perhaps not so promptly as a wreck caused me to be 15 minutes late. No worries, after reporting in, I sat for 2.5 hours until I was finally assigned to a panel. Once assigned, I made my way up to the court where I waited another 45 minutes before we finally filed into the court.
I was amused and appalled at the creative excuses everyone was giving to try to influence the attorneys to disfavor them from the jury. I was straight-forward and honest and as I sat as panelist #2, I was sure I’d be picked. As luck would have it, they skipped right over me, so I only lost one day to the experience.
I actually don’t mind serving for jury duty. I’m intrigued by watching the legal system work. As long as my view of the process is from the outside, as in not a principal in the case, I’m fine with it. This case was a theft case, the guy was accused of stealing between $100,000 and $200,000 from a Subway business. Apparently, computers involved, as the attorneys asked many questions of us panelists to try to ascertain how we felt about computers. Some representative questions were, "Have you generally had positive experiences with computers?"…"Are computers always correct?" I never had to answer any of those directly, so I was spared having to provide a characteristic overly-long reply. Given the way work has been lately, I’m not sure how my answers would have gone.
Some of the exemption excuses tendered to the court were, "I have bladder control problems"…"I was robbed on Thursday and my husband had a stroke yesterday"…"My brother was accused of stealing baseball cards, so I might have a bias"…"I don’t feel good and its getting worse"…"I have travel plans on Friday". Those are just a few, and no, the bladder control problem was not mine.
Others thought the defendant was already guilty based upon his presence in the court. The presumption of innocence is apparently a concept that attorneys cannot take for granted by prospective jurors.
When the computer questions were being asked, the attorneys targeted certain people with direct questions. Most appeared to have computer-related occupations. Strangely, I was left out. As I considered why, I surmised that my listed occupation of "Application Architect" probably was interpreted by the attorneys as that I probably build buildings.
It was not an unpleasant experience, just a bit inefficient. The court system needs to figure out how to progress things a bit quicker, I think. Thankfully, I brought two books to read while I waited. In addition, I’m looking forward to my $6 check, but sadly, it cost me $3 to park and $6 for lunch. But at least I did my civic duty and was willing to be selected if that were the desire of the court.
