<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOA 2.0&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://life.billeisenhauer.com/2005/10/03/soa-20/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Veryard SOAPbox</title>
		<link>http://life.billeisenhauer.com/2005/10/03/soa-20/#comment-55</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://life.billeisenhauer.com/2005/10/03/soa-20/#comment-55</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;SOA 2.0 Reaction&lt;/strong&gt;

Not surprisingly, my proposal for SOA 2.0 has received a mixed reaction. So far I have received email from Iona, Microsoft (x3) and SAP, and I have detected relevant bloggery from John Hagel and Bill Eisenhauer. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SOA 2.0 Reaction</strong></p>
<p>Not surprisingly, my proposal for SOA 2.0 has received a mixed reaction. So far I have received email from Iona, Microsoft (x3) and SAP, and I have detected relevant bloggery from John Hagel and Bill Eisenhauer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
